Republicans preach fiscal conservatism, yet they always find money for war | Kate Aronoff | Opinion | The Guardian

Republicans preach fiscal conservatism, yet they always find money for war | Kate Aronoff | Opinion | The Guardian

If you know who Sean Hannity is, you probably know that he is no fan of the Green New Deal. The proposal has blanketed Fox News since it debuted in November 2018, with Hannity and fellow hosts on the network narrowing in a particular line of attack, summarized during a radio spot he did last year: “What they are proposing is so outrageously expensive and cost prohibitive even they acknowledge that if we confiscated all the billionaires’ wealth, it still wouldn’t be able to pay for this mess of theirs.” Along similar lines, Republicans circulated a bogus study from the industry-funded American Action Forum claiming a Green New Deal would cost $93tn, elevating the number into something of a meme among rightwing talking heads and politicians. Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell told his colleagues it would be more than enough to “buy every American a Ferrari”.

Hannity and McConnell, along with most of the rest of the Republican party, have more recently been heaping praise onto Trump for assassinating Iranian Gen Qassem Suleimani. “This is a huge victory for American intelligence, a huge victory for our military, a huge victory for the state department, and a huge victory and total leadership by the president,” Hannity boasted after the killing. Without consulting Congress, the president kicked long-simmering US-Iran tensions up to a boil that now threatens to spill over into another full-blown war in the Middle East. His threats to bomb cultural sites throughout the country – in violation of international law – make that even more likely. So why aren’t Republicans asking how the government would pay for it?

A recent study from Brown University’s Watson Institute found that, since 2001, wars in Afghanistan, Syria and Pakistan have cost the US $6.4tn – $2tn more than all federal spending in 2018. The trouble with a prospective new war in Iran, of course, isn’t that it would cost too much money. It’s that it would put potentially millions of lives at risk, mostly to appease Donald Trump’s fragile ego, a coterie of neocons who’ve been edging toward it for years and a slew of defense contractors eager to cash in. Neither a Green New Deal nor another war would plummet the US into bankruptcy, a virtual impossibility barring earth-shattering changes to the make-up global economy. They probably wouldn’t even raise inflation.

The disconnect between Republicans’ fiscal conservatism on climate and spendthrift war drums illustrates a basic fact about American politics: that our budgets are more than anything expressions of what it is the country chooses to value – not how much money we have in the bank. The only time costs become an issue is when it comes to programs that run counter to Republican policy priorities, whether by making sure that everyone has healthcare or taking on the urgent threat of the climate crisis, the potential real costs of which are virtually exponential.

In office, Republicans have been prolific deficit spenders, from supposed small-government ideologue Ronald Reagan to George W Bush to Trump, who pushed through $2tn worth of tax cuts for the wealthy. Democrats all too often fall into the trap of worrying about the deficit, from the Clinton administration’s war on public programs to Nancy Pelosi’s seemingly religious commitment to enforcing so-called pay-as-you-go (“Paygo”) rules that would kneecap any progressive agenda. At the same time, the establishment Democrats urging fiscal prudence and (rightfully) calling Trump an illegitimate president have reliably voted to expand his military budget, arming him with $738bn for this year alone.

At this point, nobody is expecting intellectual honesty from the Republican party. Democrats, though, shouldn’t play into their hands. It’s time to be as hawkish about taking on real threats as Republicans are about taking on fake ones, whatever the cost.

  • Kate Aronoff is a writer based in New York

America faces an epic choice…

… in the coming year, and the results will define the country for a generation. These are perilous times. Over the last three years, much of what the Guardian holds dear has been threatened – democracy, civility, truth. This US administration is establishing new norms of behaviour. Anger and cruelty disfigure public discourse and lying is commonplace. Truth is being chased away. But with your help we can continue to put it center stage. It will be a defining year and we’re asking for your help as we prepare for 2020.

Rampant disinformation, partisan news sources and social media’s tsunami of fake news is no basis on which to inform the American public in 2020. The need for a robust, independent press has never been greater, and with your help we can continue to provide fact-based reporting that offers public scrutiny and oversight. Our journalism is free and open for all, but it’s made possible thanks to the support we receive from readers like you across America in all 50 states.

“America is at a tipping point, finely balanced between truth and lies, hope and hate, civility and nastiness. Many vital aspects of American public life are in play – the Supreme Court, abortion rights, climate policy, wealth inequality, Big Tech and much more. The stakes could hardly be higher. As that choice nears, the Guardian, as it has done for 200 years, and with your continued support, will continue to argue for the values we hold dear – facts, science, diversity, equality and fairness.” – US editor, John Mulholland

On the occasion of its 100th birthday in 1921 the editor of the Guardian said, “Perhaps the chief virtue of a newspaper is its independence. It should have a soul of its own.” That is more true than ever. Freed from the influence of an owner or shareholders, the Guardian’s editorial independence is our unique driving force and guiding principle.

We also want to say a huge thank you to everyone who supported the Guardian in 2019. You provide us with the motivation and financial support to keep doing what we do. We’re asking our readers to help us raise $1.5m to support our rigorous journalism in the new year. Every contribution, big or small, will help us reach it. Make a gift from as little as $1. Thank you.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.